Share Your ExpertiseAlthough we welcome the opinions of accredited experts on any item in this museum, there are some for which we are particularly interested in getting outside expertise. Here is our “hit list”: | |
![]() |
MET.SS.00324 Copper inlay for a box, Dyn. 18 With few good parallels to back up our interpretation, we welcome your opinon of our hypothesis. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.SS.00784 Iridescent alabastron, Alexandria, 50 BC The presence of what appears to be a mold seam on part, but not all of the object leaves us uncertain as to the method of manufacture and dating of this item. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.SS.00803 Polychrome glass cup, Dyn 18 We seek further opinions on this item. We have not found good parallels, and are usure of the method of fabrication (was it cast?). Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
MET.XL.00855 Bronze of a king as Nefertem, N.K. We welcome datation theories on this item. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
MET.XL.00150 King Ahmose II (?) as Osiris, Dynasty 26 We are intrigued by the very high density of the material (we plan on measuring it exactly in the near future). We are equally interested in your opinion of our hypothesis about this being Ahmose II. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
STO.MM.00366 Porphyry statue of Alexander The Great The unusual material, the musculature, the departure from Egyptian standards, and general resemblance prompted us to attribute this to Alexander, but with few parallels to backup our claim, we welcome your opinion on this hypothesis. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
WOD.VL.00823 Funeral boat, Old Kingdom, cir. 2600 BC We are intrigued by the serekh-like structure. Do you know of any parallel? Generally, can you share additional information on this item? Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
WOD.XL.00173 Nile boat with two sailors, Dyn. 11 Is this really a fishing boat? It would appear to be planked. Were fishing boats sometimes planked, or always made from reeds? Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
MET.MM.00064 Etruscan young woman, 570-550 BC We would appreciate contributions to the discussion of this item, which falls outside of our area of expertise and for which we have not found good parallels. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
MET.SS.00272 Vessel with spout, 2nd millenium BC We are uncertain as to both the purpose and the origin of this artifact, and would appreciate expert opinions with references and parallels. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.MM.00723 Polychrome glass flask with spiral coil We seek opinons on dating and origin of this vessel, with parallels. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.SS.00771 Translucent glass flask We seek opinons on dating and origin of this vessel, with parallels. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.00247 Apophis coils bead, Egypt We have been unable to find a parallell to this bead and would like help in establishing origin and datation. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.00246 Trailed eye bead Close examination established with reasonable confidence that this eye bead is trailed. We unfortunately lack documentation on this type of bead, and your assistance in dating and placing this item would be much appreciated. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.00250 Trailed eye bead Close examination established with reasonable confidence that this eye bead is trailed. We unfortunately lack documentation on this type of bead, and your assistance in dating and placing this item would be much appreciated. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.00991 Trailed eye bead Close examination established with reasonable confidence that this eye bead is trailed. We unfortunately lack documentation on this type of bead, and your assistance in dating and placing this item would be much appreciated. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.01011 Face bead of undetermined origin This type of bead is outside our experience. Is it asian? If it looks familiar to you, please apprise us. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.00995 Biconical millefiori mosaic bead The parallel from the Ernesto Wolf collection has very different millefiori inlays.We are concerned that the inlays here exhibit the flower within a flower design often seen on Venetian millefiori. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.00994 Pentagonal millefiori glass bead We would appreciate help in determining the probable origin and datation of this bead Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.SS.00242 Massive trail decorated bead We were not able to place or date this item. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.00997 Trail-decorated glass bead We could not determine the origin or datation of this bead. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.00999 Trail decorated glass bead Origin and datation undetermined. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
![]() |
GLS.VS.00988 Annular trail-decorated bead We need help in establishing the origin and datation of this bead. Go to object page (opens in a separate window) |
If you would like to share your expert opinion on these or any other item in the collection, please email us, making sure to include the item catalog number (such as ‘WOD.XL.00173’), and your name and accredition to: Thank you! | |